Ridding
Africa of Obsolete Pesticides and Contaminated Soils.
WASHINGTON, DC, August 13, 2003 (ENS) - Cleanup of
some 50,000 metric tons of obsolete pesticides and contaminated soil, now
stockpiled throughout Africa, will take place more rapidly than expected due to
a
commitment of up to $30 million from the plant
science industry trade association CropLife International. Many of these
chemicals and their containers are in poor condition, threatening the
environment and human health through
contamination of soil, water, air, and food.
The Africa Stockpiles Programme announced Thursday
that it has gratefully accepted the pledge, which CropLife International says
represents a doubling of the anticipated contribution under its current policy.
The objective of the Africa Stockpiles Programme (ASP) is an unprecedented
partnership between international and nongovernmental
organizations, governments, industry, and
multi-lateral funds who jointly support the goal of clearing all obsolete
pesticide stocks from Africa in an environmentally sound manner and putting in
place measures to avoid their accumulation in the future.
The Africa Stockpiles Programme is expected to take
12 to 15 years to complete, with the 2003-2006 Phase One involving about 15
countries. Pesticide Action Network UK, one of the program partners, says these
stockpiles include some of the most toxic pesticides ever made, many of which
have been banned for years, such as dieldrin and
toxaphene, and some may be up to 40 years old. The
dangers to health and the environment worsen with each passing day as the
chemicals continue to leak, the environmental organization warns.
Ian Johnson, vice president for sustainable
development at the World Bank, another ASP partner, said, "We cannot
ignore the benefits that appropriate pesticide use has had on agriculture,
economic development, and public nutrition, however, we must also acknowledge
that misused and obsolete pesticides now pose a clear and present danger to the
health and nutrition of the Africa population. The World Bank is dedicated to
the cleanup across the continent, and very much appreciates CropLife
International's commitment."
CropLife International is the global federation
representing the plant science industry. Led by companies such as BASF, Bayer
CropScience, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont, FMS, Monsanto, Sumitomo and Syngenta, it
encompasses a worldwide network of regional and national associations in 85
countries. CropLife International member companies have already committed to
fund the cost of incinerating obsolete stocks that they originally
manufactured, CropLife International Director General Dr. Christian Verschueren
explained from the federation's headquarters in Brussels.
The increased contribution to the Africa Stockpiles
Programme is aimed at making safe particularly hazardous stocks and on the
provision of expertise in the management and coordination of disposal
operations. Verschueren said, "Our industry is experienced in executing
these highly specialized operations and we are offering our expertise to ensure
the ASP succeeds with this ambitious program. We would like to see the 15 year
timeframe currently proposed for the project to be reduced if possible, and we
will explore ways of achieving this with our partners."
High temperature incineration in dedicated hazardous
waste incinerators is the currently recommended method for disposal of obsolete
pesticides, as outlined in United Nations Disposal Guidelines issued jointly by
the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the UN Environment Programme, and
the World Health Organization. But such sophisticated incinerators do not exist
in developing countries. The FAO explains that it is necessary to re-package
pesticide waste in new UN approved containers where they exist in developing
countries, transport them overland to a major port and then by sea to a country
where there is a dedicated hazardous waste destruction facility.
Shipment has to comply with the International
Maritime Dangerous Goods Code and the Basel Convention on the restrictions of
Transboundary movement of toxic waste. The FAO estimates that the cost of
disposal ranges between US$3,000 and US$4,500 per metric ton.
The ASP estimates the total cost for clearing the
entire continent of Africa of its stockpiles of obsolete pesticides to be
US$150 to 175 million.
Prevention measures will include pesticide use
reduction and improved management of pesticides, and will vary with the needs
of individual countries. The total budget for prevention measures is estimated
at US$50 to 75 million. The total need for funding is expected to be US$200 to
250 million, the ASP estimates.
The FAO explains that farmers in developing countries
plead for pesticides with which to combat locusts, grasshoppers, other insects,
grain eating birds, and rodents that inflict damage to their crops, bringing
hunger and misery. When pesticides reach individual farmers or household
dwellers who value them, they are kept in houses with food and animals.
Pesticide vendors take the opportunity to promote pesticides aggressively, the
FAO says. "It is not uncommon to find pesticides being stored in the open
or in heavily populated zones and usually in substandard stores and sold along
with food and drinks."
Children are used in advertising sales of pesticides
and often get easy access to pesticides, the FAO says. "They play with
empty pesticide cans and use them for drinking water or milk. Most pesticide
cans litter high streets or are simply dumped in open municipality dumps for
subsequent open burning, leading to serious emissions of dioxins," says
the UN
agency, which has been working to get rid of obsolete
pesticides since 1994.
"The potential for environmental disaster will
be complicated and more expensive if the situation is not dealt with swiftly
and safely," the FAO says.
Partners in the Africa Stockpiles Programme include:
the African Development Bank, the African Union, the Basel Convention
Secretariat, Canada, CropLife International, the European Union, the Food &
Agricultural Organization, the French Republic, the Global Environment
Facility, Japan, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of
Sweden, the New Partnership for Africa's Development, the Pesticide Action
Network Africa, the Pesticide Action Network
UK, the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, the United
Nations Environment Programme, the United Nations Industrial Development
Organization, The United Nations Institute for Training & Research, The
World Bank, The World Health Organization, and WWF, the conservation
organization.